From: Thomas Flavel Subject: Re: Reorganising the gfx directory structure, whats solid and whats not To: pingus-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:49:35 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: pingus-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On 24 Oct 2000, Ingo Ruhnke wrote: > I am currently trying to reorganize the directory structure of the > gfx, so that we will have the solid objects cleanly seperated from the > normal ones, same for hotspots and other stuff. Excellent > The only solid objects I currently have for sure are the metal > plates. I am not sure how to solve the problem with the egypt bricks, > the pipes and some other stuff. So comments or edited versions of > these images are very welcome. Imho the egypt bricks should be solid purley because there are no other solid images for the egypt theme (and the metal plates don't fit in very nicley) Sand could quite easily be used if diggable ground is needed so I can't see any disadvantage, also they have a beveled edge which makes the look 3D afaics - I think this has been discussed before but I can't remember the conclusion... On the other hand pipes look to me to be diggable because they do not have rivets. My thinking is that if it has rivets it is solid. Or, if it is not metal then if it is beveled then it is solid. How will users be able to add their own graphics? - Tom _______________________________________________ pingus-devel mailing list pingus-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/pingus-devel